tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9633767.post2646062648480516442..comments2024-03-25T09:11:17.877-07:00Comments on The Curious Wavefunction: Ahmed Zewail and the challenges of intercultural chemistryWavefunctionhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14993805391653267639noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9633767.post-25194324091656941872014-10-27T19:32:23.428-07:002014-10-27T19:32:23.428-07:00I think Szostak's case is rare. I am aware of ...I think Szostak's case is rare. I am aware of cases where someone has won the prize long after they have actively left research eg. Richard HeckWavefunctionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14993805391653267639noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9633767.post-45101701888043992462014-10-26T15:59:21.105-07:002014-10-26T15:59:21.105-07:00For example, if I am not mistaken, last year Jack ...For example, if I am not mistaken, last year Jack W. Szostak talked at Museum of Science and he said he's not interested in his Nobel work and focusing on different projects.Chemdiaryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06428076032546974013noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9633767.post-47962478784767410592014-10-26T15:56:31.112-07:002014-10-26T15:56:31.112-07:00Have you ever written a blog post about Nobel priz...Have you ever written a blog post about Nobel prize winners' research and contributions to science after they win the prize? I know most of them receive the prize sometimes decades after the initial work, but most of them usually are/were still active scientists for many more years after winning the prize. <br /><br />I am also wondering how many of them have won the prize for some work that had done some time in the past and never went into details of it and moved to other projects. <br /><br />My curiosity came from a talk by Schrock that I attended yesterday. Chemdiaryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06428076032546974013noreply@blogger.com