In the matter of Walter Lewin, MIT goes medieval

By now most people must have heard the unpleasant news that Walter Lewin, the beloved and world-renowned physics teacher at MIT whose legendary video lectures drew comparison with the Feynman Lectures on Physics has been barred from campus and stripped of his emeritus professor title in response to charges of sexual harassment of a student in one of his MITx courses. Unfortunately, considering the very public fame that Lewin achieved, MIT has been frustratingly silent on divulging the details of the events, but we can only assume that the charges were quite serious and supported by strong evidence.

It's a very painful and precipitous fall from grace for someone who had achieved the kind of stardom reserved for a handful of science personalities - images of Lewin swinging from a pendulum to demonstrate how its period is independent of its mass, or risking being struck in the face and badly hurt by having the pendulum approach his face within a hairsbreadth are now part of science folklore. As someone who has savored many of his lectures as well as his book, I am not the only one to feel pained, confused and stunned.

What I find bizarre is that MIT has chosen to take down all the lectures that made him famous. I simply don't understand this, especially since they have quoted reasons of "safety" in doing this - how could Lewin possibly entice or harass students simply through explaining the motion of a simple pendulum through an old, archived lecture? Apply whatever punishment you see fit to him but why deprive millions of students around the world of the joy of physics? As an institution that pioneered online courses through the Open Courseware modules, it is particularly damning to have MIT engage in this action.

Sadly, the purging of Lewin's lectures from the online universe cannot help but bear comparison to the book burning and blacklisting of speech and writing that was so endemic in the Dark and Middle ages. MIT's actions are akin to banning, say, Wagner's operas because he was anti-Semitic, or Peter Debye's equations because there are hints that he was silently permissive at the very least during the rise of the Nazis. Their actions remind me of the movie "The Ten Commandments" in which, after learning that his beloved son is actually the son of a Hebrew slave, the Pharaoh issues an edict to have Moses's name stricken from every monument and parchment in the land so that his very existence can be erased from history. It really shouldn't be so hard to separate men from their actions, and I cannot understand what motive MIT could have had in taking down the lectures. I am assuming that content in the Internet age is not as lost to the chasm of ignorance as content existing in a few select printed volumes four hundreds years ago, but the issue is really about the medium, not about the message.

Whatever their motive, the message MIT is sending to the world is not too complimentary - we will put the objectivity of knowledge on the same pedestal as the fallibility of human beings, and if we find evidence for one we will banish the other one too. It's a very troubling precedent in my opinion. I do hope that especially an institution as committed to the spread of knowledge as MIT reconsiders the decision.

Update: I am glad to see that prominent MIT computer science professor Scott Aaronson has the same thoughts and in fact believes even more strongly than I that taking down the lectures is a huge mistake. I also agree with him that MIT needs to be much more forthcoming and transparent in revealing the details of the case to a perplexed public.

"I’m someone who feels that sexual harassment must never be tolerated, neither here nor anywhere else.  But I also feel that, if a public figure is going to be publicly brought down like this (yes, even by a private university), then the detailed findings of the investigation should likewise be made public, regardless of how embarrassing they are.  I know others differ, but I think the need of the world to see that justice was done overrides MIT’s internal administrative needs, and even Prof. Lewin’s privacy (the names of any victims could, of course, be kept secret). 
More importantly, I wish to register that I disagree in the strongest possible terms with MIT’s decision to remove Prof. Lewin’s lectures from OpenCourseWare—thereby forcing the tens of thousands of students around the world who were watching these legendary lectures to hunt for ripped copies on BitTorrent.  (Imagine that: physics lectures as prized contraband!)  By all means, punish Prof. Lewin as harshly as he deserves, but—as students have been pleading on Reddit, in the MIT Tech comments section, and elsewhere—don’t also punish the countless students of both sexes who continue to benefit from his work.  (For godsakes, I’d regard taking down the lectures as a tough call if Prof. Lewin had gone on a murder spree.)  Doing this sends the wrong message about MIT’s values, and is a gift to those who like to compare modern American college campuses to the Soviet Union."

12 comments:

  1. As someone who lived a substantial part of his life in the Soviet Union, I am finding it more and more difficult to find any difference between the the modern American college campus and the old Soviet Union.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Soviet union? Isis is perhaps a better comparison.

      Delete
  2. Aaronson made both points very clear:

    1- More details should have been provided!
    I can imagine (and even feel) a growing sense of resentment toward MIT as many may think this decision was made because of internal political issues or that it was just a misunderstanding that could be easily resolved by a notice, rather than trying to destroy him like this!!! Personally, I don't buy the whole harassment accusation!!

    2- The videos shouldn't be taken down!!!

    Couldn't put them any better!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She was ALLEGEDLY harassed. We seem to be living now in a society in which an accusation is tantamount to a conviction. University investigations of such matters fall far short of the due process protections that we have rightly come to expect in the real world. They are typically knee-jerk, draconian reactions calculated to avoid litigation, not fair trials with strict standards of evidence.

      Delete
  3. I think it says a lot more than any assumptions:

    https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/03/10/despite-mits-decision-delete-walter-lewins-lecture-videos-live

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree! What a silly thing to equate his teaching with other parts of his life...and to the detriment of all of us who loved the OWC and podcasts from MIT. It's as if we are all being punished. There is no correlation. This needs to be reversed. Absurd. Disturbingly absurd.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Excuse me? Someone is charged with sexual harassment and you're mad that their videos have been taken down? Of course they have been taken down! That'd be the same as a teacher being convicted of being a paedophile and still being let to teach. How can you not see that? There are a myriad of other videos available to people FREE OF CHARGE which are just as effective at communicating physics ideas on the web. Try not to be so closed-minded as to attack an institution that didn't want to indirectly advertise support of someone convicted of sexual harassment. That's pretty forward thinking if you ask me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you serious? He is the best professor of physics of all MIT´s history and his videos are just amazing. I am not justifying his acts, he should be on prision, but his work is very important for the community. Other famous investigators have done worst things but their job is still there, why is he different?

      Delete
    2. Because accused = convicted. SMH.

      Delete
  6. Nice analysis of yours, showing due respect to the talents of dr Lewin, that I share with you by the way.

    The only thing that worries me in your paper is that you speak nowhere about Lewin's victim. No matter how talented Dr Lewin is, she was harrassed, and that needs to be acknowledged.

    If MIT takes such decision on such a famous professor, this is because there was, based on the material facts that nor you or me could have seen, the case was serious enough. yes, Dr Lewin can't contact his viewers, but some viewers can eventuelly contact him. And this is a safety (and reputation ) issue for the MIT explaining why hey took that decision.

    Yes, pretty foorward thinking indeed...

    ReplyDelete
  7. His Lectures were the best could ever listen to. It shouln't have been removed.

    ReplyDelete
  8. has anyone ever thought of a possibility of being framed??

    ReplyDelete

Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS