Photo
51: Rosalind Franklin's astoundingly clear x-ray diffraction photograph of DNA
taken in 1952 which showed the telltale double-helical signature of DNA. The
photo received perhaps the ultimate pop cultural accolade when it became the
basis for "Photograph 51", a star power-driven play with Nicole
Kidman playing Franklin.
This photo is fascinating in many ways, perhaps most
controversially because Franklin's supervisor Maurice Wilkins (who she saw not
as a supervisor but as an equal) showed it to
James Watson without his knowledge: in Watson's account, when he saw it his
"jaw dropped and pulse raced". The pieces swirling around in his and
Francis Crick's mind fell in place and the rest was history.
The
image is also very intriguing because it points to one of the great what-ifs of
scientific history. Franklin was undoubtedly the best DNA crystallographer in
the world and there was nothing anywhere else that came close to the clarity of
this work, so the tantalizing question is: how soon would she have hit on the
idea of a double helix herself? My guess is, not too soon. As wronged as
Franklin was by the male establishment and history, she was stubborn and
defensive and not very open to other fields, especially chemistry and
model-building, the two fields which mattered the most for nailing down the
solution to the puzzle. Feeling besieged by the men around her, she was loath to collaborate. Much more than any raw brilliance, Watson and Crick's biggest
quality was their willingness to do whatever it takes and beg, borrow, ask -
and steal - from any field necessary to crack the structure. In the parlance of
Isaiah Berlin's parable, Franklin was a hedgehog, Watson and Crick were foxes.
If she had lived Franklin *should* most definitely have shared
in the Nobel Prize for the discovery of the helix: whether she *would* have is
another of the what-ifs of history, although given the male domination of
the prizes it seems unlikely. Sadly history silenced the question: Franklin
died in her 30s of cancer, an iconic figure to generations of future scientists
and female scientists in particular.
