Field of Science

  • in PLEKTIX
  • in The Large Picture Blog
  • in The Biology Files
  • in The Phytophactor
  • in Labs
  • in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
  • in RRResearch
  • in Angry by Choice
  • in Sex, Genes & Evolution
  • in Games with Words
  • in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
  • in The Greenhouse
  • in Variety of Life
  • in inkfish
  • in The View from a Microbiologist
  • in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
  • in The Culture of Chemistry
  • in Skeptic Wonder
  • in The Astronomist
  • in C6-H12-O6
  • in Life of a Lab Rat
  • in Catalogue of Organisms
  • in Doc Madhattan
  • in Disease Prone
  • in A is for Aspirin
  • in Pleiotropy
  • in Moss Plants and More
  • in The Curious Wavefunction
  • in Rule of 6ix
  • in Chinleana
  • in History of Geology
  • in Field Notes

It's the simple things that...

I learnt my lesson. The problematic molecule for which our NMR data was not making sense turned out to have some protons with really long relaxation times. I had read a line in some well known NMR book which said "For any detailed study, it's best to measure T1 relaxation times before the experiment". I read it, and I forgot it. Well, not forgot it entirely, but it's still true that for most molecules, relaxation times are similar for all the protons and not doing a T1 does not really make a difference. In our case unfortunately, it were the reference protons for the NOESY distance calculation that turned out to have loooong T1s. Simple solution: measure T1, and then set the relaxation delay (d1 for Varian spectrometers) equal to 5T1. I am in the process of rerunning the NOESY. But from next time, I am never going to forget doing a T1 measurement before anything else, even for simple and 'obvious' moelcules. It's a humbling lesson well learnt for me.

2 comments:

Markup Key:
- <b>bold</b> = bold
- <i>italic</i> = italic
- <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">FoS</a> = FoS